ES व्यापार चिह्न अधिनियम, 1999 के अन्तर्गत किन आधारों पर व्यापार चिह्न के पंजीकरण से इंकार किया जा सकता है?

Grounds for Refusal of Trademark Registration Under the Trademarks Act, 1999

The Trademarks Act, 1999, provides legal protection for unique brand names, logos, and marks used in business. However, not all trademarks can be registered. Sections 9 and 11 of the Act specify the grounds on which a trademark can be refused registration.

---

1. Absolute Grounds for Refusal (Section 9, Trademarks Act, 1999)

These grounds apply when a trademark lacks distinctiveness, is deceptive, or is against public interest.

(i) Lack of Distinctiveness (Section 9(1)(a))

• If a trademark is generic or too common, it cannot be registered.
• Example: Words like "Best Rice" for a rice brand.

(ii) Descriptive Trademarks (Section 9(1)(b))

• Trademarks that only describe the product's quality, nature, or purpose are not registrable.
• Example: "Sweet" for sugar or "Cold" for ice cream.
• Exception: If a descriptive trademark has acquired distinctiveness through long-term use (e.g., "Apple" for computers), it may be registered.

(iii) Trademarks Against Public Morality or Law (Section 9(2))

• Trademarks that are obscene, offensive, or promote illegal activities are refused.
• Example: A brand name promoting drugs, violence, or racism.

(iv) Trademarks that Can Deceive the Public (Section 9(2)(a))

• A trademark must not mislead consumers about the nature or quality of goods/services.
• Example: "Pure Silk" for a product made of synthetic fabric.

(v) Prohibited or Government Symbols (Section 9(2)(b))

• Trademarks containing national symbols, flags, or emblems are not allowed.
• Example: Using the Indian national emblem in a private business logo.

---

2. Relative Grounds for Refusal (Section 11, Trademarks Act, 1999)

These grounds apply when a trademark conflicts with an existing registered mark or causes confusion.

(i) Similarity to an Existing Trademark (Section 11(1))

• If a trademark is identical or confusingly similar to an already registered mark, it will be refused.
• Example: "Pepsi Cola" resembling "Coca-Cola".

(ii) Likelihood of Confusion Among the Public (Section 11(2))

• If a new trademark can cause confusion with an existing well-known brand, it will be refused.
• Example: "Nikie" for sports shoes, resembling "Nike".

(iii) Protection of Well-Known Trademarks (Section 11(6))

• Well-known trademarks cannot be copied even for different goods or services.
• Example: Registering "Google" for clothing would be refused.

---

3. Other Grounds for Refusal

(i) Bad Faith or Fraudulent Application

• If the application is made to copy another brand unfairly, it can be rejected.

(ii) Prohibited Words Under Other Laws

• Certain words restricted under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950, cannot be used in trademarks.

---

4. Conclusion

The Trademarks Act, 1999, ensures that only unique, lawful, and non-deceptive trademarks are registered. The Registrar of Trademarks can refuse registration based on lack of distinctiveness, deception, similarity to existing marks, or conflict with public policy. Businesses must ensure their trademarks are original, non-deceptive, and legally compliant to secure registration.