Skip to main content

Followers

ES 'प्रतिसादन' एवं 'प्रतिदावा' से क्या तात्पर्य है? प्रतिदावा के सम्बंध में व्यवहार प्रक्रिया संहिता में क्या नियम दिये गये हैं? वैध प्रतिसादन तथा साम्यिक प्रतिसादन में अन्तर स्पष्ट कीजिए।

Set-Off and Counter-Claim in Civil Procedure Code

1. Meaning of 'Set-Off'

'Set-off' refers to a defense plea in a suit where the defendant claims an amount from the plaintiff that can be deducted from the plaintiff's claim. It is a form of adjustment of mutual debts between the parties.

Types of Set-Off

  1. Legal Set-Off – Available as a right under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), Order VIII, Rule 6.
  2. Equitable Set-Off – Based on equity and judicial discretion.

2. Meaning of 'Counter-Claim'

A counter-claim is a separate and independent claim made by the defendant against the plaintiff in the same suit. It is a cross-suit that allows the court to decide both claims together.

  • Governed by Order VIII, Rule 6A to 6G of CPC.
  • The defendant's counter-claim must be legally maintainable and arise from the same transaction as the plaintiff’s suit.

3. Rules Regarding Counter-Claim (Order VIII, Rule 6A to 6G CPC)

The key rules related to counter-claims are:

(i) When a Counter-Claim Can Be Filed (Rule 6A)

  • The counter-claim must relate to the same transaction as the plaintiff’s suit.
  • It can be filed along with the written statement or at a later stage before the court passes the final judgment.

(ii) Counter-Claim Treated as a Separate Suit (Rule 6A(2))

  • A counter-claim has the effect of a separate suit, and the court can decide both together.

(iii) No Need for a Separate Suit (Rule 6D)

  • A counter-claim allows the defendant to avoid filing a separate suit, thereby saving time and litigation costs.

(iv) Plaintiff’s Right to File a Reply (Rule 6A(3))

  • The plaintiff can file a written statement to contest the counter-claim.

(v) Effect of Plaintiff’s Withdrawal (Rule 6E)

  • If the plaintiff withdraws the suit, the counter-claim remains pending for independent adjudication.

(vi) Judgment on Counter-Claim (Rule 6G)

  • The court passes a judgment on the counter-claim even if the original suit is dismissed.

4. Difference Between Legal Set-Off and Equitable Set-Off

Basis Legal Set-Off Equitable Set-Off
Definition A statutory right allowing the defendant to deduct a legally enforceable debt from the plaintiff’s claim. A judicially recognized right where justice demands set-off, even if it does not meet strict legal criteria.
Governing Law Order VIII, Rule 6 CPC Based on principles of equity and fairness.
Nature A strict legal right available under CPC. A discretionary relief granted by courts.
Amount Must Be Definite and ascertained. Can be unliquidated or contingent.
Arises From Same transaction or a separate transaction, but must be legally enforceable. Must arise from the same transaction.
Judicial Discretion The court has no discretion if conditions are met. The court has full discretion to allow or deny.
Example A defendant owes ₹1,00,000 to the plaintiff but also has a ₹50,000 legally enforceable claim against the plaintiff. He can set off ₹50,000. A builder sues a contractor for non-payment, but the contractor claims damages for defective materials supplied by the builder.

5. Conclusion

  • Set-off is a defense to reduce the plaintiff’s claim, whereas counter-claim is an independent claim by the defendant.
  • Legal set-off is a statutory right, while equitable set-off is based on fairness.
  • A counter-claim is broader than a set-off, as it allows the defendant to seek affirmative relief rather than just reducing the plaintiff’s claim.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...