Skip to main content

Followers

ES आज्ञप्ति का निष्पादन करने वाले न्यायालय को क्या शक्तियाँ प्राप्त हैं? समझाइए।

 Powers of a Court Executing Decrees

1. Meaning of Execution of Decree

The execution of a decree refers to the process by which a court enforces or gives effect to its judgment. The party in whose favor the decree is passed is called the decree-holder, and the party against whom it is executed is known as the judgment-debtor.

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), under Order XXI, provides various powers to the court for executing decrees.


2. Powers of an Executing Court

An executing court has several powers to ensure that the decree is enforced effectively. These powers include:

(i) Power to Determine Questions Relating to Execution

  • Section 47 CPC empowers the executing court to decide all questions relating to the execution, discharge, or satisfaction of a decree.
  • The executing court has the authority to determine disputes related to the identity of the parties, mode of execution, or objections raised by the judgment-debtor.

(ii) Power to Order Execution in Various Modes

Under Order XXI, a decree can be executed in different ways, such as:

  • By delivery of property – In cases of possession decrees.
  • By attachment and sale of property – If the judgment-debtor fails to pay the decretal amount.
  • By arrest and detention – In cases where the judgment-debtor willfully refuses to pay.
  • By appointment of a receiver – The court may appoint a receiver to manage the debtor’s property.

(iii) Power to Arrest and Detain the Judgment-Debtor

  • Under Order XXI Rule 37-40, the court may order the arrest and detention of the judgment-debtor in a civil prison if he fails to comply with a money decree.
  • However, a judgment-debtor cannot be detained if he lacks financial capacity to pay, except in cases of fraud or dishonesty.

(iv) Power to Attach and Sell the Property

  • Under Order XXI Rule 41-54, the court has the power to attach the movable or immovable property of the judgment-debtor to satisfy the decree.
  • Certain properties are exempt from attachment under Section 60 of CPC, such as:
    • Necessary household items.
    • Salary below a certain limit.
    • Pension funds, etc.

(v) Power to Appoint a Receiver

  • Under Order XL CPC, the court may appoint a receiver to take charge of the debtor’s property and manage it in the interest of the decree-holder.

(vi) Power to Conduct an Inquiry into Assets of Judgment-Debtor

  • If the decree is for the payment of money, the court can compel the judgment-debtor to disclose his assets and liabilities.
  • The court can summon the debtor and examine him under oath.

(vii) Power to Transfer Decree for Execution

  • If the judgment-debtor resides or has property in another jurisdiction, the executing court may transfer the decree to another competent court for execution (Section 39 CPC).

(viii) Power to Execute a Foreign Decree

  • Under Section 44-A CPC, a foreign decree can be executed in India if it is passed by a recognized reciprocating country.

(ix) Power to Stay Execution

  • The executing court has the power to stay execution proceedings in case of an appeal or if the judgment-debtor can prove hardship.

3. Conclusion

An executing court has wide-ranging powers under Order XXI CPC to ensure the effective implementation of decrees. These include arrest and detention of the debtor, attachment and sale of property, appointment of a receiver, and inquiry into assets. However, these powers must be exercised in compliance with the principles of justice and equity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...