Skip to main content

Followers

ES दृश्यमान स्वामी द्वारा अन्तरण सम्बन्धी विधि की पूर्ण विवेचना कीजिए।

Law Relating to Transfer by an Ostensible Owner

1. Meaning of Ostensible Owner

An ostensible owner is a person who appears to be the real owner of a property but is not the actual owner. He holds and manages the property with the consent (express or implied) of the real owner, creating a belief in the public that he is the true owner.

The law relating to transfer by an ostensible owner is governed by Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (TPA).


2. Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Provision of Section 41:

"Where a person acts as the ostensible owner of a property with the consent, express or implied, of the real owner and transfers it for consideration to another person who takes it in good faith and after due diligence, the transfer shall not be voidable, and the real owner cannot reclaim the property."

Objective of Section 41

  • To protect bona fide purchasers who buy property from an ostensible owner.
  • To ensure certainty in property transactions.
  • To prevent the real owner from misleading third parties and later claiming ownership.

3. Essentials of a Valid Transfer by an Ostensible Owner

For a transfer by an ostensible owner to be valid and binding on the real owner, the following conditions must be satisfied:

(i) The Transferor Must Be an Ostensible Owner

  • The person transferring the property must appear as the real owner to the public.
  • The real owner must have allowed the ostensible owner to deal with the property.
  • Example: A father allows his son to manage and deal with family property, creating an impression that the son is the real owner.

(ii) Consent of the Real Owner

  • The real owner must have given express or implied consent to the ostensible owner’s possession and dealings.
  • Mere temporary possession (e.g., tenant or licensee) does not make someone an ostensible owner.

(iii) Transfer Must Be for Consideration

  • The buyer must have paid a valid consideration (money or value) for the transfer.
  • If the transfer is without consideration (e.g., a gift), Section 41 does not apply.

(iv) Purchaser Must Act in Good Faith

  • The buyer must believe that the ostensible owner is the real owner.
  • There should be no fraud or collusion between the ostensible owner and the buyer.

(v) Buyer Must Take Reasonable Care

  • The buyer must conduct due diligence and inquire into the ownership status.
  • Failure to verify title can result in the real owner reclaiming the property.

4. Legal Effect of a Transfer by an Ostensible Owner

  • If all conditions under Section 41 are fulfilled, the transfer is valid and binding on the real owner.
  • The real owner cannot claim back the property from the buyer.
  • If the purchaser was negligent in verifying ownership, the real owner can challenge the transfer.

5. Judicial Interpretation

Ramcoomar v. Macqueen (1872)

  • The Privy Council held that where the true owner allows another to appear as the owner, an innocent purchaser should be protected.

Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar (2005)

  • The Supreme Court ruled that an ostensible owner’s transfer is binding on the real owner if the buyer exercised due diligence.

6. Exceptions to Section 41

The rule does not apply in the following cases:

  1. If the real owner has not given consent – Unauthorized possession does not make someone an ostensible owner.
  2. If the buyer fails to verify ownership – A careless buyer cannot claim protection.
  3. If the transfer is without consideration – A donee or heir cannot benefit under this rule.
  4. If the transfer violates statutory restrictions – Transfers restricted by law (e.g., tribal land restrictions) are void.

7. Conclusion

The doctrine of transfer by an ostensible owner (Section 41, TPA) is based on justice and fairness. It protects bona fide purchasers who act in good faith and with due diligence. However, the real owner must have consented to the ostensible ownership, and the buyer must verify ownership before purchasing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...