Skip to main content

Followers

ES वादों की सुनवाई किस प्रकार प्रारंभ की जाती है? किस पक्षकार को मामले की सुनवाई में अपना साक्ष्य सबसे पहले प्रस्तुत करने का अधिकार होता है?

 

Hearing of the Suit: Procedure and Right to Begin

The hearing of a civil suit begins once the pleadings are complete, summons have been served, and both parties have appeared before the court. The procedure for the commencement of the hearing is governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) in India. Below are the key steps involved:


1. Steps in the Hearing of a Suit

(i) Opening of the Case

  • On the date fixed for the hearing, the judge calls the case and ensures that both parties are present.
  • The plaintiff or his advocate presents an opening statement outlining the case.

(ii) Framing of Issues

  • The court frames issues based on the pleadings, which are the disputes between the parties that need adjudication.
  • Issues may relate to facts, law, or a mix of both.

(iii) Plaintiff’s Evidence

  • Since the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (under Section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872), he begins by presenting his evidence.
  • The plaintiff presents oral and documentary evidence to support his claim.
  • The plaintiff and his witnesses undergo examination-in-chief, followed by cross-examination by the defendant's lawyer.

(iv) Defendant’s Evidence

  • After the plaintiff's evidence is concluded, the defendant presents his defense.
  • The defendant and his witnesses are examined in a similar manner as the plaintiff.
  • The defendant may also present documentary evidence to counter the plaintiff's claim.

(v) Arguments by Both Parties

  • Once all evidence is recorded, both parties present their arguments.
  • Lawyers on both sides highlight the strengths of their case and weaknesses in the opposing party’s evidence.

(vi) Judgment and Decree

  • After hearing the arguments, the judge pronounces the judgment.
  • The decree is formally drawn based on the judgment.

2. Which Party Has the Right to Begin the Case First?

The plaintiff has the right to begin his case first in most situations, as he bears the initial burden of proof. However, in certain circumstances, the defendant may have the right to begin. Below are the key principles:

  1. Plaintiff’s Right to Begin

    • As per Order XVIII Rule 1 of the CPC, the party who has the burden of proof in the suit generally begins first.
    • Since the plaintiff initiates the lawsuit and claims relief, he must first prove his allegations.
  2. Defendant’s Right to Begin (In Exceptional Cases)

    • If the defendant admits the plaintiff’s claim but raises a counterclaim, the defendant may get the right to begin.
    • If the court directs, the defendant may lead with his evidence first, especially if he has raised a special plea which requires prior consideration.

3. Conclusion

The hearing of a suit begins with procedural formalities, followed by the presentation of evidence and arguments. In most cases, the plaintiff has the right to begin since he carries the burden of proof. However, in special cases like counterclaims or legal defenses requiring priority consideration, the defendant may be allowed to begin first.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...