Skip to main content

Followers

ES शाश्वतत्ता के विरूद्ध नियम की व्याख्या कीजिए तथा इसके अपवादों का भी उल्लेख कीजिए।

Rule Against Perpetuity: Meaning, Application, and Exceptions

1. Meaning of Rule Against Perpetuity

The Rule Against Perpetuity is a legal principle that prevents property from being tied up indefinitely for future generations. It restricts the creation of future interests in property that delay absolute ownership for an unreasonable period.

In India, this rule is codified under Section 14 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, which states:
"No transfer of property can create an interest that takes effect after the lifetime of one or more living persons at the time of transfer, plus a further period of eighteen years."

Objective of the Rule

  • To ensure free circulation and transferability of property.
  • To prevent property from being tied up indefinitely in favor of unborn persons.
  • To avoid hindrance to economic development by keeping property from being commercially useful.

2. Essentials of the Rule Against Perpetuity

For a transfer to violate the rule, it must involve:

  1. A vested or contingent interest in favor of an unborn person.
  2. A delay in ownership beyond a reasonable period (lifetime of existing persons plus 18 years).
  3. A situation where the absolute right of enjoyment is postponed indefinitely.

3. Exceptions to the Rule Against Perpetuity

Certain transfers are exempted from this rule, meaning they are valid even if they extend beyond the prescribed period. The main exceptions include:

(i) Transfer for the Benefit of the Public (Charitable or Religious Purpose)

  • If property is transferred for a charitable or religious purpose, the rule does not apply.
  • Example: A trust created for the education of underprivileged children can continue indefinitely.

(ii) Covenants Related to Land

  • Agreements imposing conditions restricting the use of land for a longer period are allowed.
  • Example: A covenant preventing the construction of commercial buildings in a residential area.

(iii) Personal Agreements (Contracts and Pre-Emptive Rights)

  • If a contract creates a right of first refusal (pre-emption right) for an indefinite period, it is enforceable.
  • Example: A contract giving a tenant the first right to purchase a property whenever the landlord decides to sell it.

(iv) Perpetual Lease

  • A lease for an indefinite period is valid, provided it does not create an interest in the property beyond permitted limits.
  • Example: A lease agreement stating that the tenant can renew the lease indefinitely.

(v) Hindu Joint Family Property

  • The rule does not apply to Hindu joint family property where property is passed down through generations via survivorship.

(vi) Government Grants

  • Property granted by the government is not subject to this rule.
  • Example: The government can grant land for perpetual public use.

4. Judicial Interpretation of the Rule

  • In Stanley v. Leigh (1732), it was held that property cannot remain inalienable forever.
  • In Girjesh Dutt v. Datadin (1934), the Privy Council ruled that a bequest in favor of an unborn person without a prior life interest to a living person violates the rule.

5. Conclusion

The Rule Against Perpetuity ensures that property is not locked indefinitely and remains available for commerce and economic activity. However, public welfare transfers, contracts, and government grants are exempted from this restriction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...