Skip to main content

Followers

ES सुखाचारों का पुनः प्रवर्तन

 

Revival of Easement: Detailed Explanation

1. Meaning of Revival of Easement

  • Easement is a legal right that allows one person to use another's land for a specific purpose (e.g., right of way, right to water, or light).
  • If an easement is extinguished, it can sometimes be revived under certain conditions, restoring the original rights.
  • Revival of Easement refers to the process by which an extinguished or suspended easement is reinstated, allowing the dominant owner to exercise the right again.

2. Legal Provisions for Revival of Easement

A. Indian Easements Act, 1882

The Indian Easements Act, 1882 governs the creation, suspension, and revival of easements in India.

  • Section 51 and Section 52 of the Act deal with the conditions under which an easement can be revived.
  • If an easement is temporarily suspended or extinguished due to certain reasons, it can be restored when those reasons no longer exist.

3. Grounds for Revival of Easement

An easement can be revived in the following circumstances:

1. Revival After Temporary Suspension

  • If an easement was only suspended and not permanently extinguished, it automatically revives when the suspension ends.
  • Example:
    • If a dominant owner temporarily stops using a path due to a blocked road, the easement revives once the obstruction is removed.

2. Revival After Unity of Ownership Ends

  • If the dominant and servient tenements become owned by the same person, the easement is extinguished.
  • However, if the ownership is later separated, the easement may revive.
  • Example:
    • A person owns two adjacent plots (A and B). If the person sells Plot B, the old right of way from Plot A over Plot B may revive.

3. Revival by Necessity (Easement of Necessity)

  • If an easement was extinguished but later becomes necessary again, it can be revived.
  • Example:
    • If a landlocked property loses its previous access to the road and no other reasonable path exists, the right of way may be revived.

4. Revival by Grant or Agreement

  • If an easement was formally extinguished, it can be revived through a fresh grant or agreement between the parties.
  • Example:
    • If the owner of a servient land had revoked an easement earlier, they may agree to restore it through a new contract.

5. Revival After Removal of Permanent Obstruction

  • If an easement was lost due to a permanent obstacle that is later removed, the easement may revive.
  • Example:
    • A public canal was built blocking a private right of way. If the canal is later removed, the easement may revive.

6. Revival by Prescription (Continuous Use for 20 Years)

  • If an easement is interrupted for some time but later used continuously for 20 years, it may be revived by prescription under Section 15 of the Easements Act.
  • Example:
    • A person had a right to use water from a well but stopped using it. If they use it continuously for 20 years again, the easement revives.

4. When an Easement Cannot be Revived?

An easement cannot be revived if:
✔ It was permanently extinguished by legal action or express agreement.
✔ The dominant tenement (the property that benefits from the easement) no longer exists.
✔ A new legal restriction prevents revival (e.g., government orders).


5. Conclusion

The revival of an easement depends on whether it was temporarily suspended or permanently extinguished. If the original circumstances are restored, the easement may be reinstated under the Indian Easements Act, 1882. However, if the easement was completely abolished, revival is only possible through a fresh agreement, necessity, or prescription.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...