Skip to main content

Followers

Question -14 निर्वचन के आन्तरिक सहयोगियों के संबंध में एक निबन्ध लिखिए। निर्णीत वादों की सहायता से इसे समझाइए।

 Write an essay on Internal Aids to Interpretation. Explain it with decided cases.

Answer-14

Internal Aids to Interpretation

Internal aids to the interpretation of statutes refer to those elements that are found within the text of the statute itself. These aids assist in determining the true meaning of the legislative provisions. They are considered primary tools for interpreting statutes and are typically applied before referring to external aids such as legislative history or other external materials. The main objective is to discern the intention of the legislature in enacting a statute.

1. Title of the Act

             The title of a statute plays an important role in understanding its scope and purpose. The title provides an overall indication of the objective of the statute, which can guide the interpretation of ambiguous provisions within the statute.

             Case Example: State of Rajasthan v. G. Chawla (1959) – The court held that the title of an Act could be used to aid in the interpretation of its provisions, provided the text of the statute is ambiguous or unclear.

2. Preamble

             The preamble is a statement at the beginning of a statute that outlines the reasons and objectives for its enactment. While the preamble is not strictly part of the statute, it can be used as a guide to interpret the statute, especially in cases of ambiguity.

             Case Example: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) – The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of the preamble in interpreting the Constitution of India. The preamble helped the Court to understand the spirit and philosophy of the Constitution and interpret its provisions accordingly.

3. Section Headings and Marginal Notes

             Section headings and marginal notes are often used by courts to clarify the meaning of provisions, especially when the section is complex or unclear. They provide a concise summary of the content of the section and can give insight into its legislative intent.

             Case Example: Gurbachan Singh v. Union of India (1971) – The court noted that the marginal notes or headings of a statute could be used as an internal aid to interpret the provisions of the statute, though they are not legally binding.

4. Interpretation Clauses

             Many statutes contain interpretation clauses that define terms used in the statute. These clauses are crucial in providing precise meanings for specific terms that may otherwise be vague or ambiguous.

             Case Example: Maxwell v. The Director of Public Prosecutions (1960) – The court applied the interpretation clause to determine the meaning of a word used in the statute, guiding the court to understand how the term should be applied in the context of the statute.

5. Proviso

             A proviso is an exception or condition attached to a particular provision in a statute. Courts often rely on the proviso to clarify the meaning of the main provision it qualifies.

             Case Example: K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1954) – The court used the proviso to limit the effect of a statutory provision and found that it restricted the general rule set out in the main clause of the statute.

6. Non-obstante Clauses

             A non-obstante clause is used to override any other law or provision that might conflict with the provision that follows it. These clauses are often included to ensure that the statute has overriding power.

             Case Example: Central Bank of India v. Workmen (1969) – The Supreme Court interpreted a non-obstante clause to give effect to the statutory provision even if it conflicted with other provisions in existing laws.

7. Syllabi or Notes in Legislation

             Sometimes statutes include detailed explanations or summaries that appear at the beginning of each section. These are called syllabi or notes and serve to clarify the provisions of the statute.

             Case Example: Ramsingh v. State of Punjab (1952) – The court referred to the notes accompanying the statute to interpret a provision regarding criminal liability, aiding the understanding of the legislative intent.

8. Use of Singular or Plural Terms

             The use of singular or plural terms within a statute may offer clues as to the legislative intent. If the statute refers to something in the plural form, it may be interpreted as encompassing multiple items or entities. Conversely, the singular form may indicate a singular intent.

             Case Example: K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1954) – The Court interpreted the use of the plural term in the statute to mean that it included multiple parties or objects, giving broader effect to the provision.

9. Reference to Other Provisions in the Same Statute

             Sometimes, one section of a statute refers to another section within the same statute. These cross-references serve to clarify the legislative intention, providing a cohesive understanding of related provisions.

             Case Example: M/s. K. K. Verma v. Union of India (1954) – The court referred to the cross-references within the statute to interpret a provision in a way that was consistent with the other sections of the law.

10. Context of the Statute

             The context within which a provision is situated within the statute can help interpret its meaning. Understanding how a provision relates to others within the same statute is key to ensuring that it is interpreted in harmony with the overall scheme of the law.

             Case Example: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Babu Ram (1995) – The court examined the context of the statute in its entirety to interpret the scope and application of a provision. It emphasized that the interpretation should be consistent with the objectives and framework of the entire Act.

Conclusion

Internal aids to interpretation are invaluable tools for understanding the true intent of legislation. The title, preamble, headings, provisos, and interpretation clauses all provide insight into how provisions should be understood and applied. Courts, while interpreting statutes, rely on these internal aids as their first step in resolving any ambiguities. However, it is important to note that while internal aids are helpful, they should be used in conjunction with external aids when necessary, especially in complex or unclear cases. These aids together help ensure that the law is applied fairly and consistently in line with the intentions of the legislature.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...