Skip to main content

Followers

Question-15 'अर्थान्वयन साहचर्येण ज्ञायते' का सिंद्धान्त क्या है ? इसकी विवेचना निर्णीत वादों की सहायता से कीजिए।

 What is the principle of 'Noscitur a sociis'? Discuss this with the help of decided cases.

Answer- 15

Principle of ‘Noscitur a Sociis’ in Interpretation of Statutes

The principle of 'Noscitur a Sociis' is a Latin maxim which translates to "a word is known by the company it keeps." In the context of statutory interpretation, it suggests that the meaning of an unclear or ambiguous word or phrase should be determined by looking at the words or phrases surrounding it. The surrounding words can provide context that clarifies the meaning of the uncertain word.

This principle is used by courts to interpret legislative provisions that are vague or susceptible to more than one meaning. By considering the entire section, chapter, or statute, the court can infer the true meaning of the ambiguous word or phrase.

Key Points of ‘Noscitur a Sociis’

1.            Contextual Interpretation: The central idea is that words must be interpreted in the context of other words they appear with. This helps to resolve ambiguity by considering the whole provision rather than isolating a single term.

2.            Restricting or Expanding the Meaning: By examining the surrounding words, the meaning of the word in question can either be restricted (if the surrounding words are more specific) or expanded (if the surrounding words are broader).

3.            Avoiding Absurd or Inconsistent Results: This principle ensures that a word is not given an interpretation that leads to an absurd or unreasonable result, thus maintaining harmony within the entire statute.

4.            Use in Ambiguity: ‘Noscitur a Sociis’ is most useful when a word or phrase is ambiguous or vague. The context in which it appears can help clear the ambiguity and lead to a more reasonable, consistent interpretation.

Case Laws Illustrating ‘Noscitur a Sociis’

1.            Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa (1978)

In this case, the Supreme Court applied the principle of Noscitur a Sociis to interpret the term 'industrial dispute'. The court looked at the context in which the term 'industrial dispute' was used in the Industrial Disputes Act, interpreting it in light of the surrounding provisions to determine that 'industrial dispute' included matters related to workers and management.

2.            State of West Bengal v. Union of India (1964)

The court applied the Noscitur a Sociis principle while interpreting the term "forests" in the Constitution. The term 'forests' was clarified to include both "forests" and "woodlands" by looking at the context of other words and legislative history around the term.

3.            M. Pentiah v. M. Thirumalamma (1961)

The court referred to Noscitur a Sociis when interpreting the term "land" in the context of inheritance laws. The term was understood to include the various forms of property and interests in land, which was clarified by the surrounding provisions that dealt with the transfer and distribution of land and property.

4.            K. K. Verma v. Union of India (1954)

The case highlighted the application of the Noscitur a Sociis rule in the interpretation of the term "taxable services" under the Finance Act. The surrounding clauses were scrutinized to clarify the meaning of "taxable services," ensuring that only those services that were logically related to the scope of taxation were included.

5.            Shivaji v. State of Maharashtra (1969)

In this case, the Supreme Court used the Noscitur a Sociis rule to interpret the term "property" under the Indian Penal Code. The court interpreted "property" in the context of the law to include movable property, based on its surrounding words, which dealt with theft, damage, and misappropriation.

Conclusion

The Noscitur a Sociis principal aids in giving clarity to statutory language by emphasizing the need to interpret words in light of their context. By doing so, the courts prevent interpretations that could lead to unjust, impractical, or absurd results. This principle encourages a more harmonious and reasonable approach to interpreting statutes.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...