Skip to main content

Followers

Question- 17 भारत के संविधान के निर्वचन के विभिन्न सिद्धान्त क्या हैं? विवेचना कीजिए।

 What are the different principles of Interpretation of the Constitution of India? Discuss.

Answer-17

The Interpretation of the Constitution of India is a complex process that requires understanding the meaning and intent of its provisions. It is guided by certain principles that ensure the Constitution is interpreted in a way that is consistent with its spirit and objectives. The following are some of the key principles of constitutional interpretation, discussed point-wise:

1. Literal Rule

             Explanation: The literal rule of interpretation mandates that the words of the Constitution must be given their plain, ordinary meaning unless there is ambiguity.

             Application: Courts will interpret provisions using their natural meaning unless it leads to absurdity or injustice. For example, if the Constitution uses the term "citizen," it refers to the commonly understood meaning of a person with legal nationality.

2. Purposive Interpretation

             Explanation: This principle requires the interpretation of the Constitution based on the purpose or object behind the provision, rather than just the literal text.

             Application: The courts often seek the intention of the framers to promote the fundamental values of justice, equality, and liberty. For instance, the interpretation of "right to life" under Article 21 goes beyond the literal meaning and covers a wide range of rights, including the right to a clean environment.

3. Golden Rule

             Explanation: The Golden Rule allows for the modification of the literal meaning if it leads to absurd results. If the literal meaning contradicts the spirit of the Constitution, the courts may adapt the meaning to avoid such outcomes.

             Application: This rule is applied to modify any provision of the Constitution that may lead to an unreasonable or unintended result if interpreted literally.

4. Harmonious Construction

             Explanation: This principle requires that different provisions of the Constitution must be interpreted in a way that harmonizes them, rather than creating a conflict between them.

             Application: Courts must ensure that no provision is interpreted in a way that contradicts another. For example, the principles of fundamental rights (Part III) and directive principles of state policy (Part IV) must be interpreted together to avoid conflict, where the directives are meant to guide the government towards achieving justice and equality.

5. Doctrine of Constitutional Morality

             Explanation: This doctrine suggests that the Constitution should be interpreted in a manner that upholds the underlying values of constitutionalism, like democracy, secularism, and rule of law, even if the specific text does not directly address an issue.

             Application: The courts use this doctrine to interpret provisions in light of fundamental values, especially when applying rights and freedoms. For instance, the judiciary has often invoked constitutional morality to protect individual rights such as the right to privacy.

6. Historical Context and Intent of the Framers

             Explanation: This principle involves interpreting the Constitution with regard to the context in which it was drafted and the objectives of the framers of the Constitution.

             Application: Judicial interpretation often looks at debates from the Constituent Assembly, as well as historical and social contexts at the time of drafting, to understand the intent behind certain provisions. This helps in providing a deeper understanding of the law, especially when faced with constitutional amendments.

7. Evolutive or Dynamic Interpretation

             Explanation: The Constitution is a living document that must be interpreted dynamically to address evolving social, economic, and technological realities.

             Application: The courts interpret constitutional provisions in a manner that reflects contemporary values and needs, even if the text has not changed. For example, the expansion of the right to life under Article 21 includes modern rights like the right to internet access and the right to a clean environment.

8. Strict Construction vs. Liberal Construction

             Explanation: Strict construction refers to a narrow and literal interpretation, while liberal construction means interpreting the provisions more broadly to encompass modern-day needs.

             Application: While some provisions, especially regarding the powers of the government, may be interpreted strictly, others—such as fundamental rights—are often interpreted more liberally to reflect societal progress.

9. Presumption of Constitutionality

             Explanation: The courts presume that all laws and actions are constitutional unless proven otherwise. This presumption places the burden of proof on the party challenging the law's constitutionality.

             Application: Courts apply this principle to uphold the validity of laws unless there is a clear and obvious contradiction with the Constitution.

10. Doctrine of Severability

             Explanation: If a part of the law or a provision in the Constitution is found to be unconstitutional, the rest of the provision or law may still stand, unless it is inextricably linked to the invalid part.

             Application: This doctrine helps preserve the overall integrity of laws and constitutional provisions while invalidating only the problematic parts.

11. Presumption Against Infringement of Fundamental Rights

             Explanation: Courts interpret constitutional provisions with a presumption that they do not infringe on fundamental rights unless there is a clear and explicit conflict.

             Application: This principle ensures that the protection of fundamental rights is given priority, especially when interpreting laws or government actions that could potentially violate those rights.

12. Principle of Progressive Realization

             Explanation: This principle, derived from the Directive Principles of State Policy, suggests that some rights and duties in the Constitution should be realized progressively over time, considering the economic and social conditions.

             Application: The state is expected to work towards progressively achieving the goals outlined in the directive principles, even if the full realization may take time.

In conclusion, constitutional interpretation in India is a process that balances literal meanings with broader principles like justice, equity, and the evolving social context. The courts aim to uphold the core values of the Constitution, adapting its application to meet contemporary needs while respecting its original intent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...