Skip to main content

Followers

4. Prepare a writ petition against state under article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of writ of Habeas Corpus on the basis of the assumed facts.

Here is a sample writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus, based on assumed facts. 


IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 

WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS


IN THE MATTER OF:

[Name of Petitioner]
S/o [Father’s Name],
Aged [Age] years,
Resident of [Full Address],
Mobile No.: [Contact No.]
...Petitioner

VERSUS

  1. State of [State],
    Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs,
    [Secretariat Address]

  2. Superintendent of Police,
    [District Name], [District Address]

  3. Station House Officer,
    [Police Station Name], [Address]
    ...Respondents


TO,

The Hon’ble Chief Justice and His Companion Justices of the Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh,
The humble Petition of the Petitioner above named:


MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

1. Facts of the Case:

That the petitioner is filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus for immediate release of the petitioner's brother, Mr. Ramesh Kumar, aged 25 years, who has been illegally and unlawfully detained by the local police of [Police Station Name], District [District Name], since 01.06.2025 without any charge, FIR, or production before a Magistrate within 24 hours, in violation of Article 22(2) of the Constitution of India.

2. That Mr. Ramesh Kumar was picked up by the police at about 10:00 AM on 1st June 2025 from his residence without providing any reasons or warrant of arrest. Since then, he has not been produced before any court nor has any formal charge been disclosed.

3. That the petitioner made several written and verbal representations to the concerned police authorities and the District Superintendent of Police, but no information has been provided regarding the whereabouts or the legal grounds of detention of Mr. Ramesh Kumar.

4. That the illegal detention is violative of the fundamental right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and the procedure established under Article 22 of the Constitution of India.


GROUNDS:

a) Because the detention is wholly illegal, arbitrary and without authority of law.
b) Because the detenu has not been informed of the grounds of arrest or detention.
c) Because he has not been produced before a Magistrate within 24 hours as mandated by law.
d) Because such detention is in direct contravention of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India.


PRAYER:

In view of the facts stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:

  1. Issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce Mr. Ramesh Kumar, the brother of the petitioner, before this Hon’ble Court and to set him at liberty forthwith;

  2. Call for the records pertaining to the alleged illegal detention;

  3. Pass such other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the interest of justice.


AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL EVER PRAY.

Filed by:
[Name of Advocate]
Advocate for the Petitioner
[Address, Bar Enrolment No., Contact Info]

Place: [City]
Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]


VERIFICATION

I, [Name of the Petitioner], S/o [Father’s Name], aged [Age] years, resident of [Address], do hereby verify that the contents of the above petition are true and correct to my personal knowledge and belief.
Verified at [City], this [Day] of [Month], 2025.

Petitioner
(Signature)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

चिल्ड्रन डे की ढ़ेरों बधाईयां

  मेरे प्यारे नन्हें बच्चों!   पहले, मैं सभी बच्चों को इस दिन की बहुत-बहुत शुभकामनाएँ देना चाहता हूँ। आप सभी इस दुनिया का सबसे अनमोल हिस्सा हैं। आपके शिक्षक उम्र और तजुर्बे में आपसे काफी बड़े है, बढ़ती उम्र उनके माथे में अनायास सिकन लाती है l दुनियाभर की बेमतलब जिम्मेदारियों के बोझ में शिक्षक को सुकून तब मिलता है जब आपका मुस्कुराता हुआ चेहरा सामने आता है l आपको शायद अभी इसका अहसास न हो, लेकिन इस बात में कोई दो राय नहीं है कि आप सभी उस ईश्वर/भगवान या उस अलौकिक परमतत्व के प्रतिरूप है l  चिल्ड्रन डे, जो कि हमारे प्रिय पंडित जवाहरलाल नेहरू के जन्मदिन पर मनाया जाता है, हमें यह याद दिलाता है कि बच्चों का भविष्य हमारे समाज का भविष्य है। नेहरू जी ने हमेशा बच्चों के विकास और शिक्षा को प्राथमिकता दी। उन्होंने कहा था कि "बच्चे हमारे भविष्य हैं," और यही कारण है कि हमें उन्हें प्यार, देखभाल और सही दिशा में मार्गदर्शन देना चाहिए। आज का दिन सिर्फ उत्सव मनाने के लिए नहीं हैं, बल्कि हमें यह भी सोचना है कि हम बच्चों को कैसे एक सुरक्षित, खुशहाल और समृद्ध जीवन दे सकते हैं। हमें बच्चों क...

भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय

  संगठन चार्ट प्रधान सचिव रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक सूचीकरण) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार / एआर-सह-पीएस शाखा अधिकारी/कोर्ट मास्टर व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायिक प्रशासन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (खरीद एवं भंडार) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार-I (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायाधीश प्रशासन एवं अंतर्राष्ट्रीय संबंध) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (प्रौद्योगिकी) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार(कंप्यूटर) शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी/ तकनीक. सहायक-सह-प्रोग्रामर रजिस्ट्रार-II (गोपनीय कक्ष) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप रजिस्ट्रार सहायक रजिस्ट्रार शाखा अधिकारी व्यवहार करने वाले अधिकारी रजिस्ट्रार (न्यायालय एवं भवन) अतिरिक्त रजिस्ट्रार उप...

1. B.Shah vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, AIR 1978 SC 12

 Ref : AIR 1978 SC 12 Sub :- This case is based on Section 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 Facts of the case:- 1. A woman by the name of Sulbamal worked in an industry named Mount Stuart Estate which was related to planta- tion. 2. Sulbamal gave an application for maternity leave. The estimated period for delivery was 16-12-1967 and she deliv- ered the child on this very date. 3. Maternity benefit was given by way of salary for 72 work- ing days by the employer to the woman workman, but in this period Sunday being the holiday, was excluded by the employer. 4. Thus, being dissatisfied with the amount so provided, she filed an application before the employer in this regard. 5. It was demanded by the woman workman that she should be given full benefit of 12 weeks under the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which is of full 84 days, not of 72 days because Sunday is also included in it. 6. But, she was denied of the payment of full 84 days by the employer. Trial Court...